<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stop phishing around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strivepr.com/2007/03/26/stop-phishing-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strivepr.com/2007/03/26/stop-phishing-around/</link>
	<description>experts in digital PR and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 12:09:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: sherrilynne</title>
		<link>http://strivepr.com/2007/03/26/stop-phishing-around/comment-page-1/#comment-8320</link>
		<dc:creator>sherrilynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2007 07:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strivepr.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/stop-phishing-around/#comment-8320</guid>
		<description>Hi Rob!

Thanks for stopping by.  You sure have been keeping below the radar recently.  I agree with your comments but with $105 billion to be had, it will be difficult to stem the tide on phishing, methinks...regardless of who&#039;s footing the bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rob!</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by.  You sure have been keeping below the radar recently.  I agree with your comments but with $105 billion to be had, it will be difficult to stem the tide on phishing, methinks&#8230;regardless of who&#8217;s footing the bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Mercer</title>
		<link>http://strivepr.com/2007/03/26/stop-phishing-around/comment-page-1/#comment-8308</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strivepr.com/wordpress/2007/03/26/stop-phishing-around/#comment-8308</guid>
		<description>Maybe we are looking at the wrong end of this problem. Let&#039;s assume that anyone can pretend to be somebody else. The real issue is that it&#039;s become easier for someone to perform an unauthorised transaction. The issue of identity theft will not go away while the cost of the problem is borne by the consumer. If instead the cost of unauthorised transactions fell to the financial organisations themselves, then solutions may be found.

There is also the classic trade-off between security and usability here. On the one hand we want an easy smooth transaction with little fuss, whilst at the same time we ask for the highest security possible. It&#039;s not easy to design a system like this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe we are looking at the wrong end of this problem. Let&#8217;s assume that anyone can pretend to be somebody else. The real issue is that it&#8217;s become easier for someone to perform an unauthorised transaction. The issue of identity theft will not go away while the cost of the problem is borne by the consumer. If instead the cost of unauthorised transactions fell to the financial organisations themselves, then solutions may be found.</p>
<p>There is also the classic trade-off between security and usability here. On the one hand we want an easy smooth transaction with little fuss, whilst at the same time we ask for the highest security possible. It&#8217;s not easy to design a system like this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
