<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Isle of Man media fails in its duties?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://strivepr.com/2007/11/21/isle-of-man-media-fails-in-its-duties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://strivepr.com/2007/11/21/isle-of-man-media-fails-in-its-duties/</link>
	<description>experts in digital PR and social media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 21:34:59 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Murphy</title>
		<link>http://strivepr.com/2007/11/21/isle-of-man-media-fails-in-its-duties/comment-page-1/#comment-10872</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://strivepr.com/wordpress/2007/11/21/isle-of-man-media-fails-in-its-duties/#comment-10872</guid>
		<description>Not just one email exchange, I&#039;m afraid. I would not be so rash as to make comment on the basis of that alone.

The comment is based on the very particularly aggressive attitude of the IoM press towards any form of dissent - more aggressive by far than that in Jersey, for example.

I have yet to be interviewed in the IoM without the journalist siding absolutely with the government. Now, I don&#039;t expect journalists to agree with me. But I do expect them to be open minded and to be willing to consider alternative opinion.

My concern is simple. I have not found evidence of that in the IoM. And I am really not sure that it is appropriate for an IoM journalist to question my credibility in the way it was done in the manner referred to in the email exchange I have published. Disagreement is one thing. For the journalist to question credibility because of disagreement alone is something entirely different.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Richard Murphy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not just one email exchange, I&#8217;m afraid. I would not be so rash as to make comment on the basis of that alone.</p>
<p>The comment is based on the very particularly aggressive attitude of the IoM press towards any form of dissent &#8211; more aggressive by far than that in Jersey, for example.</p>
<p>I have yet to be interviewed in the IoM without the journalist siding absolutely with the government. Now, I don&#8217;t expect journalists to agree with me. But I do expect them to be open minded and to be willing to consider alternative opinion.</p>
<p>My concern is simple. I have not found evidence of that in the IoM. And I am really not sure that it is appropriate for an IoM journalist to question my credibility in the way it was done in the manner referred to in the email exchange I have published. Disagreement is one thing. For the journalist to question credibility because of disagreement alone is something entirely different.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.taxresearch.org.uk/blog/" rel="nofollow">Richard Murphy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
